References

Accelerating scientific progress with preprints. (2024). Nature Computational Science, 4(5), 311–311. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-024-00641-4

Arel-Bundock, V. (2025). Model to Meaning: How to Interpret Statistical Models with R and Python. CRC Press.

Arel-Bundock, V., Greifer, N., & Heiss, A. (2024). How to Interpret Statistical Models Using marginaleffects for R and Python. Journal of Statistical Software, 111, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v111.i09

Arslan, R. (2026, April 13). Science needs downvotes. The 100% CI. https://www.the100.ci/2026/04/13/science-needs-downvotes/

Baker, D. H., Vilidaite, G., Lygo, F. A., Smith, A. K., Flack, T. R., Gouws, A. D., & Andrews, T. J. (2021). Power Contours: Optimising Sample Size and Precision in Experimental Psychology and Human Neuroscience. Psychological Methods, 26(3), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000337

Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001

Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLOS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473

Buckheit, J. B., & Donoho, D. L. (1995). WaveLab and Reproducible Research. In A. Antoniadis & G. Oppenheim (Eds.), Wavelets and Statistics (Vol. 103, pp. 55–81). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2544-7_5

Chambers, C. D. (2017). The Seven Deadly Sins of Psychology: A Manifesto for Reforming the Culture of Scientific Practice. Princeton University Press.

Cumming, G. (2014). The New Statistics: Why and How. Psychological Science, 25(1), 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613504966

Debrouwere, S., & Rosseel, Y. (2022). The Conceptual, Cunning, and Conclusive Experiment in Psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(3), 852–862. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211026947

DeBruine, L. M., & Barr, D. J. (2021). Understanding Mixed-Effects Models Through Data Simulation. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920965119. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920965119

Devezer, B., Navarro, D. J., Vandekerckhove, J., & Ozge Buzbas, E. (2021). The case for formal methodology in scientific reform. Royal Society Open Science, 8(3), 200805. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200805

Donoho, D. L. (2010). An invitation to reproducible computational research. Biostatistics, 11(3), 385–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxq028

eLife; eLife Sciences Publications Limited. (2024, May 7). Open Science: Why you should preprint your next paper. https://elifesciences.org/inside-elife/85d36b45/open-science-why-you-should-preprint-your-next-paper

Feest, U., & Devezer, B. (2025, January). Toward a More Accurate Notion of Exploratory Research (And Why it Matters) [Preprint]. https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/24482/

Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3, 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393

Frank, M. C., Braginsky, M., Cachia, J., Coles, N. A., Hardwicke, T. E., Hawkins, R. D., Mathur, M. B., & Williams, R. (2025, January 30). Experimentology. https://experimentology.io/

Gabry, J., Simpson, D., Vehtari, A., Betancourt, M., & Gelman, A. (2019). Visualization in Bayesian Workflow. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 182(2), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12378

Gelman, A. (2024). Before data analysis: Additional recommendations for designing experiments to learn about the world. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 34, 190–191.

Gelman, A., Vehtari, A., & McElreath, R. (2026). Statistical workflow. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 384(2321), 20250293. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2025.0293

Gelman, A., Vehtari, A., McElreath, R., Simpson, D., Margossian, C. C., Yao, Y., Kennedy, L., Gabry, J., Bürkner, P.-C., Modrák, M., & Barajas, V. L. (2026). Bayesian Workflow. CRC Press. https://books.google.com?id=ur7bEQAAQBAJ

Gelman, A., Vehtari, A., Simpson, D., Margossian, C. C., Carpenter, B., Yao, Y., Kennedy, L., Gabry, J., Bürkner, P.-C., & Modrák, M. (2020, November 3). Bayesian Workflow. http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.01808

Gigerenzer, G. (2018). Statistical Rituals: The Replication Delusion and How We Got There. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 198–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918771329

Guest, O. (2024). What Makes a Good Theory, and How Do We Make a Theory Good? Computational Brain & Behavior, 7(4), 508–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-023-00193-2

Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2021). How Computational Modeling Can Force Theory Building in Psychological Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1745691620970585. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585

Healy, K. (2019). Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.

Heathcote, A., Lin, Y.-S., Reynolds, A., Strickland, L., Gretton, M., & Matzke, D. (2019). Dynamic models of choice. Behavior Research Methods, 51(2), 961–985. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1067-y

Higgins, W. C., Ross, R. M., Langdon, R., & Polito, V. (2022). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test Shows Poor Psychometric Properties in a Large, Demographically Representative U.S. Sample. Assessment, 10731911221124342. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911221124342

Higgins, W. C., Savalei, V., Polito, V., & Ross, R. M. (2026). Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test Scores Demonstrate Poor Structural Properties in Nine Large Non-Clinical Samples. Assessment, 33(2), 204–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251328604

Hintzman, D. L. (1991). Why are formal models useful in psychology? In Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock. (pp. 39–56). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Hussey, I. (2025). Data is not available upon request. Meta-Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2023.4008

Hussey, I., & Hughes, S. (2020). Hidden Invalidity Among 15 Commonly Used Measures in Social and Personality Psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 166–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919882903

Jones, H. S. (1957). Halley as an Astronomer. Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, 12(2), 175–192. https://www.jstor.org/stable/530833

Kay, M. (2024). Ggdist: Visualizations of Distributions and Uncertainty in the Grammar of Graphics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 30(1), 414–424. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3327195

Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: A Tutorial Introduction with R. Academic Press.

Kruschke, J. K., & Liddell, T. M. (2018). The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective. Psychon Bull Rev, 25(1), 178–206. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1221-4

Krypotos, A.-M., Mertens, G., Klugkist, I., & Engelhard, I. M. (2022). Preregistration: Definition, Advantages, Disadvantages, and How It Can Help Against Questionable Research Practices. In W. O’Donohue, A. Masuda, & S. Lilienfeld (Eds.), Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology (pp. 343–357). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04968-2_15

Külpmann, A. I., Ries, J.-P., Hussey, I., & Elson, M. (2026, January 24). Methodological Flexibility in the Iowa Gambling Task Undermines Interpretability: A Meta-method Review (4g3vr_v1). https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/4g3vr_v1/ (Pre-published)

Lakens, D. (2022). Sample Size Justification. Collabra: Psychology, 8(1), 33267. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.33267

Lakens, D., Mesquida, C., Rasti, S., & Ditroilo, M. (2024). The benefits of preregistration and Registered Reports. Evidence-Based Toxicology, 2(1), 2376046. https://doi.org/10.1080/2833373X.2024.2376046

Lewis, C. (2024). Data Management in Large-Scale Education Research. Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781032622835

McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan. CRC press.

Meehl, P. E. (1967). Theory-Testing in Psychology and Physics: A Methodological Paradox. Philosophy of Science, 34(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1086/288135

Meehl, P. E. (1990a). Appraising and Amending Theories: The Strategy of Lakatosian Defense and Two Principles that Warrant It. Psychological Inquiry, 1(2), 108–141. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0102_1

Meehl, P. E. (1990b). Why Summaries of Research on Psychological Theories are Often Uninterpretable. Psychological Reports, 66(1), 195–244. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1990.66.1.195

Navarro, D. J. (2020). If mathematical psychology did not exist we would need to invent it: A case study in cumulative theoretical development. https://psyarxiv.com/ygbjp/

Nordmann, E., McAleer, P., Toivo, W., Paterson, H., & DeBruine, L. M. (2022). Data Visualization Using R for Researchers Who Do Not Use R. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 5(2), 25152459221074654. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459221074654

Nosek, B. A., Beck, E. D., Campbell, L., Flake, J. K., Hardwicke, T. E., Mellor, D. T., van’t Veer, A. E., & Vazire, S. (2019). Preregistration is hard, and worthwhile. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(10), 815–818.

Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2

Poldrack, R. (2021). Hard to Break : Why Our Brains Make Habits Stick. 1–232. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5558859

Proulx, T., & Morey, R. D. (2021). Beyond Statistical Ritual: Theory in Psychological Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 671–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211017098

Ramsey, R. (2026). A workflow for experiment planning and data analysis in education research (version 0.1). https://rich-ramsey.github.io/li-lab-workflow/

Rohrer, J. M., & Arel-Bundock, V. (2026). Models as Prediction Machines: How to Convert Confusing Coefficients Into Clear Quantities. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 9(2), 25152459261424825. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459261424825

Roth, J., Duan, Y., Mahner, F. P., Kaniuth, P., Wallis, T. S. A., & Hebart, M. N. (2025). Ten principles for reliable, efficient, and adaptable coding in psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Communications Psychology, 3(1), 62. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-025-00236-3

Scheel, A. M., Schijen, M. R. M. J., & Lakens, D. (2021). An Excess of Positive Results: Comparing the Standard Psychology Literature With Registered Reports. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(2), 25152459211007467. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211007467

Scheel, A. M., Tiokhin, L., Isager, P. M., & Lakens, D. (2021). Why hypothesis testers should spend less time testing hypotheses. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16, 744–755. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966795

Simmons, J., D. Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Pre-registration: Why and How. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208

Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on Generality (COG): A Proposed Addition to All Empirical Papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630

Stevenson, N., Donzallaz, M., Innes, R., Forstmann, B., Matzke, D., & Heathcote, A. (2025). EMC2: An R Package for cognitive models of choice. https://osf.io/2e4dq_v2

Vuorre, M., & Curley, J. P. (2018). Curating Research Assets: A Tutorial on the Git Version Control System. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918754826

Wickham, H., Çetinkaya-Rundel, M., & Grolemund, G. (2023). R for Data Science. "O’Reilly Media, Inc.". https://books.google.com?id=TiLEEAAAQBAJ

Wiebels, K., & Moreau, D. (2021). Leveraging Containers for Reproducible Psychological Research. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(2), 25152459211017853. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211017853

Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, Ij. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., … Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1, 1), 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18